🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks changes to a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavoured tobacco products, and watered-down penalties for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“Were I in government, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to tobacco-related illnesses, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during expanded apprehension about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Recently, global health authorities issued a warning that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of industry lobbying everywhere. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure fails to be approved because of this letter, the price could be paid in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that visual health alerts cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be reduced to less than half “following international suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than twelve months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities actually suggests a caution must occupy at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and attempt to encompass as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

BAT asks for the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would drive users to “black market” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the corporate leader of the Zambian branch says the company is dedicated to responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the associated health impact” but claims that “specific rules can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the corporation's recommended amendments would “undermine this law so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations operated within the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “complete contradiction”, he commented.

“We live in a global village. If I plant tobacco in my garden and harvest that and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my community's youth are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Public health laws in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the campaigner stated. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its activities following with applicable local laws. Additionally, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the appropriate structures which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that minors should be protected from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and smoking product business, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.