🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani would win while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. He possesses a talent for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for him, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass half. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate dominant in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were pretty staunchly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that every city in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.