🔗 Share this article Accused Bondi Beach Attackers Acted Alone and Did Not Undergo Training in the Philippines, Investigators State. Australian law enforcement state there is no evidence the accused Bondi Beach gunmen operated as part of a broader group. The two alleged gunmen responsible for the deadly incident at a Jewish gathering on Bondi Beach, resulting in 15 lives, reportedly operated independently, according to national police. Police additionally revealed that Sajid Akram, 50, and his 24-year-old son Naveed Akram travelled to the Philippines on 1 November. Their travel plans involved landing in the main city Manila before transiting that same day to Davao City. The duo returned to Sydney on 29 November. Lack of Proof of Training During Stay Investigators have stated the duo did not undergo any form of terrorist coaching or "planning" during their time in the Philippines. Early inquiries from Philippine authorities point to they "rarely left" their hotel. The attack—labeled as Australia's most severe mass shooting since 1996—has been formally declared a terrorist incident. "We are currently examining the evidence," the commissioner stated, noting that preliminary reviews suggest that "the two men are believed to have been lone actors." Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett briefed the press on Tuesday that surveillance material documenting the accused attackers' activities in the Philippines had been submitted to domestic authorities. "Our investigation shows no evidence to suggest these suspects were part of a broader network, or were instructed by overseas entities to execute an incident," Commissioner Barrett stated. Yet, the pair were likewise not in the Philippines on a leisure trip, she added. She underscored that, since the probe is continuing, additional details could emerge. Inspiration and Legal Charges Earlier, Australian leader Anthony Albanese commented it appears both accused attackers were "motivated by the so-called Islamic State" extremist views. During the attack, Sajid Akram was killed by police. He and his son Naveed—equipped with firearms—are accused of having opened fire on guests at the Hanukkah celebration. Naveed Akram, who was injured and taken to hospital after the shooting, has been charged with 59 charges. These include 15 charges of murder and one count of committing a terrorist act. He is scheduled to face court in April. Immigration Information In the wake following the attack, immigration authorities in the Philippines stated that the older suspect had entered the country using an Indian passport, while his son used an Australian passport. The two had listed the metropolis of Davao as their intended endpoint. Their booked journey back to Australia was for Sydney. Davao is a expansive city on the eastern side of Mindanao, the Philippines' primary island in the south. It is noted that, Islamist fighters have reportedly operate in poorer parts of central and south-western Mindanao.
Australian law enforcement state there is no evidence the accused Bondi Beach gunmen operated as part of a broader group. The two alleged gunmen responsible for the deadly incident at a Jewish gathering on Bondi Beach, resulting in 15 lives, reportedly operated independently, according to national police. Police additionally revealed that Sajid Akram, 50, and his 24-year-old son Naveed Akram travelled to the Philippines on 1 November. Their travel plans involved landing in the main city Manila before transiting that same day to Davao City. The duo returned to Sydney on 29 November. Lack of Proof of Training During Stay Investigators have stated the duo did not undergo any form of terrorist coaching or "planning" during their time in the Philippines. Early inquiries from Philippine authorities point to they "rarely left" their hotel. The attack—labeled as Australia's most severe mass shooting since 1996—has been formally declared a terrorist incident. "We are currently examining the evidence," the commissioner stated, noting that preliminary reviews suggest that "the two men are believed to have been lone actors." Australian Federal Police Commissioner Krissy Barrett briefed the press on Tuesday that surveillance material documenting the accused attackers' activities in the Philippines had been submitted to domestic authorities. "Our investigation shows no evidence to suggest these suspects were part of a broader network, or were instructed by overseas entities to execute an incident," Commissioner Barrett stated. Yet, the pair were likewise not in the Philippines on a leisure trip, she added. She underscored that, since the probe is continuing, additional details could emerge. Inspiration and Legal Charges Earlier, Australian leader Anthony Albanese commented it appears both accused attackers were "motivated by the so-called Islamic State" extremist views. During the attack, Sajid Akram was killed by police. He and his son Naveed—equipped with firearms—are accused of having opened fire on guests at the Hanukkah celebration. Naveed Akram, who was injured and taken to hospital after the shooting, has been charged with 59 charges. These include 15 charges of murder and one count of committing a terrorist act. He is scheduled to face court in April. Immigration Information In the wake following the attack, immigration authorities in the Philippines stated that the older suspect had entered the country using an Indian passport, while his son used an Australian passport. The two had listed the metropolis of Davao as their intended endpoint. Their booked journey back to Australia was for Sydney. Davao is a expansive city on the eastern side of Mindanao, the Philippines' primary island in the south. It is noted that, Islamist fighters have reportedly operate in poorer parts of central and south-western Mindanao.